| |
|
|
|
|
 |
FREEDOM
TO CHANGE , by Frank P. Jones
Book Review
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FREEDOM TO CHANGE
by Frank Pierce Jones
Book Review
by Tasha Miller and David Langstroth
Freedom to Change was originally published in
1976 under the title, Body Awareness in Action. Coming
three years after Dr. Barlow's influential book, The
Alexander Principle, it added significantly to the body
of reliable information about the Alexander Technique.
Jones covers the history of the Technique, his own personal
experiences, the involvement of famous people such as
John Dewey and Aldous Huxley and the context and content
of Alexander's four books. On top of all this, Jones
provides details of his own programme of research into
the Alexander Technique, carried out at the Institute
for Applied Experimental Psychology at Tufts University.
Frank Pierce Jones is one of the important figures in
the history of the Technique. Yet, until his mid thirties
he was a classical scholar, teaching Greek at Brown
University in the United States. After meeting the Technique
and experiencing its value for his own problems he took
the decision to train as a teacher. Jones had the rare
benefit of having lessons with both F.M. Alexander,
the founder of the Technique, and his brother, A.R.
Alexander.
Jones gives a good account of the famous libel case
that Alexander brought in South Africa. A physical education
instructor had written in a magazine that Alexander
was a quack, and Alexander successfully sued him for
damages. Expert witnesses, such as the eminent neurologist
Sir Charles Sherrington gave evidence on Alexander's
behalf, and although Alexander won his case, the judge,
in summing up concluded that this did not mean that
the Alexander Technique had been proven. Alexander always
disagreed. The proof lies in putting the principles
to the test and judging for yourself, something which
the judge did not do. Nevertheless, Frank Pierce Jones
set about in his own research trying to find that proof.
Jones focused on trying to find evidence of a different
quality of movement between actions performed independently,
or guided by an Alexander Technique teacher. He used
multiple exposure photography, electromyograms, force
platforms and x-ray photography. His data is clear and
unambiguous and he is justified in claiming to have
found the evidence he sought. His use of multiple image
photography was particularly brilliant. This records
a series of images throughout a movement. In doing so
it avoids the danger of the standard photograph, which
is to emphasise posture.
This book is well written, with lots of personal stories
and anecdotes to bring it to life. As well as looking
with precision at the narrowly defined parameters of
his experiments he extrapolates outwards to consider
the implications of the Technique for bigger issues
such as nuclear war and mental health. The one failing
of the book is that it could be better organised. Sections
do not always run smoothly one into the next, and the
Appendices at the back are confusing in that they are
tacked on without explanation, repeating in some cases
material that has been given before.
In spite of these flaws, this is a classic of the Alexander
Technique repertoire. It is the sort of book which requires
thought and careful study, and is probably not ideal
as an introduction to the Technique. Yet for those who
want to know more it is highly recommended. It should
certainly be in the bookshelf of any serious student
or teacher
Thanks to Tasha
Miller and David Langstroth for permission to use their
review of Jones' book from
www.alexandertechniqueatlantic.ca
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
©
Athanase Vettas |
|
Webmaster |
|
|